Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 1281 - 1300 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
Universal Laboratories, Inc., 293 NY 200 (1944), decided by the New York Court of Appeals (the state's highest court). [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, (4th Cir., Oct. 18, 2017), the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision held that a 40-foot tall Latin Cross on government property created as a World War I Veterans' Memorial violates the Establishment Clause. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
 May 16, 2021Appellate Division, Second DepartmentSupreme Court had authority to modify child support under DRL § 236[B][9][b][2][i] upon showing substantial change in circumstances despite provision of agreement restricting modifications of child support In Park v Park, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 1653674, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm
By order entered February 8, 2006, the Family Court, inter alia, denied the father’s objections and father appealed. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 11:23 am by Martha New Milam
A recent North Carolina Court of Appeals opinion, Gary Michael Sluder v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
The Court of Appeals addressed the question of whether owners of the garage owed a duty to pedestrians. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:53 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Since the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
* For the purposes of  determining an individual's eligibility for an accidental disability retirement allowance pursuant to §363, in Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund, 57 NY2d 1010, the Court of Appeals defined the term accident as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary and injurious in impact. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:08 pm by Steve Vladeck
Although I continue to believe, contra Thravalos, that the Supreme Court plurality got it right in Hamdan v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:54 am by Adam Levitin
Most states have abandoned the formal law/equity division, but the principles still stand, even if the court structure does not. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Neomi Rao, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit My understanding is that Prof. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:58 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The final group of amicus briefs were filed this past week in Oil States v. [read post]