Search for: "State v. Jones" Results 1281 - 1300 of 6,826
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2016, 2:35 pm by Giles Peaker
On the engagement of Art 8, Kugathas v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 31 was followed, per Seldley LJ: “Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:38 am by Phil Cave
SCOTUS decided United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
Requiring a lifeguard applicant to take a swim test using a State issued "Speedo" swimsuit is not an act of unlawful discrimination because of ageMatter of Lester v New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation, 2009 NY Slip Op 01651, Decided on March 3, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe New York State Division of Human Rights dismissed Roy J. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
See Jones, 29 F.3d at 830 (finding that the defendants, who were employees of a state agency, were in privity with that state agency, which was the defendant in the first action); see also Schuster v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:11 am by tracey
Supreme Court Al Rawi & Ors v The Security Service & Ors [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) Home Office v Tariq [2011] UKSC 35 (13 July 2011) Court of  Appeal (Civil Division) JS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 806 (13 July 2011) Shovelar & Ors v Lane & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 802 (12 July 2011) Jones & Anor v Ruth & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 804 (12 July 2011) Pannone LLP v Aardvark… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Dan Gauss
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 2:08 pm
Jones, and denied a stay in yesterday’s case. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:12 pm by LTA-Editor
By Nicholas Ulrich A year ago, the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]