Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 14,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 2:55 am
"Absent fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances, an attorney is not liable to third parties not in privity or near-privity for harm caused by professional negligence" (Fredriksen v Fredriksen, 30 AD3d 370, 372; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 5:13 pm
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:19 pm
Price v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:52 am
Doss Appeals Again, But Loses. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday announced its decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:54 am
By Eric Goldman IO Group v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:27 am
Jan Dunning, et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:54 am
In Millea v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:55 pm
In the last post, we discussed the facts of the court case Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:27 am
" The Supreme Court reaffirmed this in Regan v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:41 pm
The nation’s highest court granted certiorari to Comptroller v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:28 am
Nor do they qualify as an admission absent evidence that the employees were authorized to speak on CSI's behalf (see Gstalder v State of New York, 240 AD2d 541, 542 [1997]; Vozdik v Frederick, 146 AD2d 898, 900 [1989]). [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Craigslist * Facebook Loses Jurisdictional Ruling in Texas Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–Facebook v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:07 pm
In 1976 the court came up with several factors that determine the best interest of the child in Holley v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:40 am
BurrThe United States Supreme Court issued 3 decisions today: Safeco Insurance v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
In Moreno v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 7:41 pm
But if the state loses, the split-recovery statute may be effectively nullified because many parties will realize that they both come out ahead if they jettison the state's statutory share of the judgment to arrive at a settlement figure that is lower than the defendant would have to pay under the judgment, but perhaps higher than the plaintiff would receive if the judgment were affirmed.This is the sort of issue that may arise in California if the Legislature revives… [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm
As a result, environmental permitting (NPDES, Title V, New Source Review) has become far more complex. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
Louisiana, in which the justices considered whether the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a unanimous jury applies to the states, and Rotkiske v. [read post]
