Search for: "State v. Major"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 45,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in WesternGeco LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 8:01 am
But in 2011, the court in Harrington v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:39 am
Here is the abstract: On July 1, 2012, Jan Crawford of CBS News reported details of the confidential deliberations of the Supreme Court of the United States in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Ramos v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:18 am
On May 5, 2015, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Wiersum v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:31 pm
Supreme Court, June 12, 2008) - In a close 5-4 majority decision, the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am
The 2016 Supreme Court of Canada decision in R v Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, created a major stir in the criminal bar by clarifying what constitutes an accused’s right under subsection 11(b) of the Charter to be tried within a reasonable time. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 3:45 am
”]; Zuckerbrod v 355 Co. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority, said FDA oversight of drug labeling doesn't prevent the filing of state tort claims. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the majority, said FDA oversight of drug labeling doesn't prevent the filing of state tort claims. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
In this case decided by the New York State Court of Appeals, the judges find that the police were allowed to conduct a limited protective search this guy's car because they reasonably thought the car had weapons.The case is People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
That's plaintiff's much better argument.The majority nonetheless rejects it, holding that, as a matter of California constitutional law, the Free Speech Clause doesn't apply to properties in which paid admission is required (unlike, say, a shopping mall).Judge VanDyke dissents, saying that the majority's test doesn't actually derive from any California cases. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 3:00 am
The decision may be read here: R. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
In Gantler v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:17 am
v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
Stepp v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 6:13 am
On October 1, 2019, plaintiffs in Brackeen v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
