Search for: "State v. Urban"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 9:14 am
Of course, the political parties of that era were far from as ideologically coherent as today’s parties, with the Democratic Party containing both conservative Southern Democrats, urban-machine Democrats, and Democrats from Western states. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, in Meredith v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:08 am
↑ Castillo v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:00 am
UNITED STATES v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
It's ironic that, even as we see the federal government assert its authority over local affairs in legislation such as PPACA and cases like United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
California State Lands Commission (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
Agri Processor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Applied Sierra Club v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:48 pm
Justice Fisher noted in Leone v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
" Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on S. 3217, S.Rep. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
" Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on S. 3217, S.Rep. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
” Urban Partnership Bank v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:26 am
In McCleskey v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm
“This decision has the potential to prevent colleges and universities across the State of California from providing students with the housing they need and deserve. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
In Enriquez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 7:35 am
No one thinks that Miranda v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am
City of Madera (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 41: A CEQA document is not mandated to address urban decay merely because the project contains a retail supercenter. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:32 am
For instance, in 1950, in Rex v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 8:33 pm
Before Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
” Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. [read post]
