Search for: "State v. Vanness"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm
The Henri Van Breda case (Van Breda v Media 24 Limited and Others [2017] ZASCA 97) has confirmed that cameras in courts are not only here to stay, but that this is mandated by the South African Constitution in order to facilitate open justice and the right of the public to hear and see what goes on in our courts. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
The Irish State could be facing millions in claims for damages from citizens if public bodies illegally process their personal information. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
The case reference is Christian Louboutin and Christian Louboutin SAS v Van Haren Schoenen BV, C-163/16.More specifically, the Dutch court is asking the CJEU to answer this question:“Is the notion of ‘shape’ within the meaning of Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive C (‘Form’, ‘vorm’ and ‘forme’ in the German, Dutch and French language versions of the Trade Marks Directive respectively) limited to the… [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:29 pm
" This trend follows the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Van Duyn ex rel Van Duyn v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:51 am
[USA Today] * Let's not go crazy: Earlier this week, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and outside counsel Keker & Van Nest were denied certiorari on the Lenz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
Van de Kamp v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:40 pm
’” In re Van Os, 844 F.3d 1359, 1361 (Fed.Cir. 2017); see also Arendi S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 9:02 am
Genzyme v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:46 pm
Amgen Richard Lloyd: The Oil States IPR Case Could Be One Of Those Rare Instances Where SCOTUS Sides With The CAFC Scott Graham: Lawmakers Plot Next Steps On Patent Reform Joseph Herndon: Credit Acceptance v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm
Likewise, even Supreme Court justices who believe that the government may not endorse religion think that it’s fine for government officials to express religious views in their speeches — here, for instance, is the view of Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Van Orden v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:11 pm
Oglala Sioux v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:48 am
The case is Griffin v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 5:10 pm
Plowman and Davison v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:45 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm
K. van Aalst, The Impact of Climate Change on the Risk of Natural Disaster 30 Disasters 5 (2006); P.J. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm
K. van Aalst, The Impact of Climate Change on the Risk of Natural Disaster 30 Disasters 5 (2006); P.J. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm
K. van Aalst, The Impact of Climate Change on the Risk of Natural Disaster 30 Disasters 5 (2006); P.J. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:19 am
Now that New York’s highest court has responded—limiting Section 296(15) to “employers” while concluding that an out-of-state nonemployer could be held liable for aiding and abetting discrimination—the Second Circuit vacated the district court’s order to the extent it conflicted with the state court’s decision and remanded for further proceedings (Griffin v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
Specifically, citing McCreary County v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 9:38 am
United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233(1945); see also Van Cauwenberghe v. [read post]
