Search for: "Steve Vladeck"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
” Commentary comes from: Jeffrey Bellin, who at CNN writes that “Merrick Garland can help bring the Supreme Court together, pushing at least one of the three branches of government out of the political muck”; Ilya Shapiro, who at Forbes contends that the “Senate is fully within its rights, given the unique nature of this judicial vacancy, to fulfill its ‘advice and consent’ function by telling the president that we should let this fall’s election determine… [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
The court’s ruling implicated several different procedural doctrines and may prove to be the ultimate cap on almost all “Bivens” suits for damages against federal officials (as Steve Vladeck discusses in this thread). [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 10:59 am
Steve Vladeck responded by pointing out that bringing detainees to U.S. soil would actually probably legally benefit the detainees, a point that Gabor overlooks in his argument. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports that as the justices take the bench this morning for what is likely the last Monday of the term, “[s]ix opinions remain, including on the travel ban, public sector unions and redistricting, and one looming question that could change the future direction of the court: Will there be a retirement? [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm
[Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh argue they do, in defense of--checks notes--Steven Donziger.] [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 1:45 pm
Indeed, the brief directly addresses arguments raised by Professor Steve Vladeck in his writings, and congressional testimony. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 6:02 am
Steve Vladeck added that the math gets even more complicated when you try to figure out the status of each of those 65 detainees. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:45 am
Steve Vladeck overviewed the DC Circuit’s Mandamus Jurisdiction and the legitimacy or the Military Commissions. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
United States, in which the justices held 7-2 that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban, Steve Vladeck, counsel for the petitioners, writes for the Harvard Law Review Blog that the case &ldq [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am
(Marbury came up quite a bit during oral argument in the case, and Steve Vladeck, who argued for Ortiz and other petitioners, will no doubt remember that Kennedy asked him whether he thought Marbury was right.) [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit reaffirmed the “Ker-Frisbie doctrine,” under which even if the U.S. breaks domestic or international law in bringing a criminal defendant within a court’s jurisdiction, this fact does not impair the court’s power to try the person (as noted by Steve Vladeck and Jennifer Daskal way back in October as to potential hurdles in the criminal prosecution of al-Libi). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
At CNN, Ariane de Vogue and Steve Vladeck report that the court’s broad reading of the exemption “came in a case concerning food stamps, in which a South Dakota newspaper had sought data from the Department of Agriculture on the number of stores participating in the federal food stamp program, and store-by-store data on the amount of purchases made using food stamps. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:22 am
Steve Vladeck has all the details. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:11 am
(Orin Kerr) Judge Katherine B. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
More precisely, Steve Vladeck writes at PrawfsBlog, a report recently issued by Physicians for Human Rights calls for a US government investigation, because most of the information that could prove or disprove such an allegation is classified. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 9:00 pm
Bradbury as well as Lawfare’s Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
” At Just Security, Steve Vladeck discusses a recent petition for writ of certiorari involving the cross-border shootings of foreign nationals and concludes that “these issues are worthy of the Supreme Court’s attention – not just in the unfortunately recurring context of cross-border shootings, but in the more general context of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
Steve Vladeck headed such conversation off, though, by noting three problems with such a prosecution: first, the section of the Logan Act prohibiting correspondence with with any foreign government “without authority of the United States” probably doesn’t apply to senators; second, the First and Fifth Amendments probably protect the senators’ letter; and finally, no one has ever been successfully prosecuted under the Logan Act. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Nor, as Goldsmith, Stephen Vladeck, and Ryan Goodman point out, does it define “what is a ‘specific action’ that must be reported under the terms of the provision. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
As to the statutory question, Steve Vladeck, who is counsel of record on all of these cases (and Abdirahman), provided a lay of the land. [read post]
