Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 9,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2020, 11:39 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:34 pm
By Diane Kindermann and Kristen Kortick United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
United States, 527 U. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:46 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
” United States v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:11 am
" United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:19 pm
United States, 511 U.S. 600, 611-12 (1994). [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien,… [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 10:18 am
So I thought I would flag the opinion today in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 2:09 am
iStock_000000617148Medium.jpg In illegal weapons possession case, defendant who objected to admitting fingerprint expert evidence that was “used ... in matching the partial latent fingerprint recovered from the [charged] firearm†to the defendant's left thumb print, had to “produce data and experts to demonstrate why†the expert evidence should not be admitted; the trial court did not improperly shift the burden of… [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 8:35 pm
(Subscription required.)BackgroundFiled by Newman Ferrara back in May of 2016 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the lawsuit, entitled Lennen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 2:07 pm
The United States agrees that the assets are not 'blocked.'" [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:32 pm
Even after being prompted by Justice Kennedy during oral arguments, former Solicitor General of the United States Donald Verrilli did not question the legal fact of a substantial burden on petitioners’ religious exercise. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Arabian v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:29 am
iStock_000000215912XSmall.jpg Witness testimony that the defendant made a telephone threat to his girlfriend was inadmissible hearsay; the government could not rely on the statement alone to meet its burden to establish the foundation to show that the girlfriend was making a statement as an agent of the defendant, under FRE 801(d)(2)(D), or made an authorized party statement, under FRE 801(d)(2)(C); error in admitting the statement was harmless, in United… [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:50 pm
Attacking the validity of a patent is attacking something granted by the United States Government, while deciding infringement is just considering one private company's arguments against another. [read post]
