Search for: "United States v. Christian" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007 For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:12 am by Anna Christensen
Finally, at Slate, Rick Hasen comments on last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the United States Code, for example, there are exemptions: in food inspection laws, allowing the preparation of food in accordance with religious practices, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:33 am by Emma Snell
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS Following the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by WIMS
THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS House Republicans Reject EPA Science Findings On Climate Change United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
Twenty-five of the forty-two states that have considered IIEI have adopted it, and the United States Supreme Court called IIEI a “widely recognized” tort. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:11 am by Angelys Torres McBride
Some states also utilized religious tests to ensure only Christian men could vote. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The North American voting machine company Dominion has hit Fox News with a $1.6bn defamation lawsuit, accusing the network of spreading election fraud lies in a misguided effort to stop an exodus of enraged viewers after Donald Trump’s 2020 election loss. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:45 am by Jeremy C. King
” Put differently, if the one doing the copying believes the customer won’t fall for the fake without a label, the product design likely does not rise to the level of trade dress. [1] Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
US, No. 2007-1220 19 C.F.R. section 181.53, a deferred duty regulation, does not violate the Export Clause, or Article I, Section 9, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
He has also cited and relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 6:19 am by Paolo Busco
This position echoes the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) stance in Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:33 am by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
As to the husband’s First Amendment arguments, the Court referred to the three prong test under the United States Supreme Court case of Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. [read post]