Search for: "United States v. Felt"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
Here are some recent developments on the sexual orientation front: In June 2013, in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:51 am
United States last Term.) [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:54 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), acting on our request for review, last week invalidated claims from a patent Personal Audio LLC was using to assert that it invented podcasting. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:54 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), acting on our request for review, last week invalidated claims from a patent Personal Audio LLC was using to assert that it invented podcasting. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:14 am
Plaintiff is a Florida corporation; it provides “Christian educational services to individuals throughout the United States … focuse[d] on men . . . through conferences it holds frequently in many states. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:43 am
K.G. and M.G. lived at Anetta's mother's house since moving to the United States and felt comfortable in their home environment. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:03 pm
Might I suggest you take a look at Lundeen Coatings, Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
Kornbluth felt no such scruples. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
On the contrary he felt that it was better to apply the CJEU’s case-law in Medion to answer the question of the referring Court.Why does the reasoning in Strigl and Securvita fall out of the scope of this request for a preliminary ruling? [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
”) State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 1:11 am
Any or all of the four potential reasons stated above would be plausible here. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
See Chen-Oster v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:15 pm
In Kanerva v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
” Having publicly stated its contrary position on many occasions, the EEOC no doubt felt compelled to get involved. [read post]
