Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
Just 5 years ago, the United States Supreme Court upheld a taking of property for purely economic reasons. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
The companies argued that, when the highly educated and highly skilled spouses of the 580,000 H-1B and 75,000 L-1 visa holders cannot obtain work authorization, all of these individuals will ultimately decide to leave the United States and take their talents to other countries. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
The companies argued that, when the highly educated and highly skilled spouses of the 580,000 H-1B and 75,000 L-1 visa holders cannot obtain work authorization, all of these individuals will ultimately decide to leave the United States and take their talents to other countries. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:32 am
Theoretically, Panel Opinion 2.0 could have a different outcome and--for instance--remand the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas with the instruction to allow Conti to amend its complaint again. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:42 pm
Roy v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:00 pm
Previously, USCIS required spouses of E, L, and H principal visa holders to apply for an employment authorization document (EAD) to lawfully work in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:49 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
The post Mohawk Tribe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
United Benefit Life Ins. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:04 pm
Holder, Jr. authorized the government to seek the death penalty in the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
On June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court answered the question “no. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
Holder, 10-694, which had been relisted once, and is likely now holding Johnson v. [read post]
