Search for: "Willing v. Willing" Results 1281 - 1300 of 16,586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 9:03 am by Stefanie Levine
Relying on the well-established criminal law doctrine of "willful blindness," the Court in Global-Tech Appliances, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:03 am by Stefanie Levine
Relying on the well-established criminal law doctrine of "willful blindness," the Court in Global-Tech Appliances, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 2:39 pm
Last July, Madam Justice Ballance provided her decision on the issue of court costs in Mawdsley v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:57 am
  We then read a variety of Supreme Court and other appellate cases, and the message I convey is (1) the courts increasingly enforce arbitration agreements that in prior years would unquestionably have been found unconscionable, and (2) courts are less and less willing to find it "excusable" for consumers to fail to read (and/or understand) what they sign, and increasingly use language that indicates how silly and unreasonable it is for a consumer not to read the entirety of a… [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
 The guidelines say sentence him to life, but the district court judge sentences him to twenty years.Casto-Ponce appeals, claiming that the trial judge found that his testimony was false, but also needed to expressly say that his testimony was on a material matter as well as willful in order to tack on the two-level enhancement, which she didn't do.The Ninth Circuit agrees. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Phillips v Murtha 2023 NY Slip Op 01767 Decided on April 04, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department demonstrates that several recurring attorney representation scenarios in wills and estates legal malpractice claims will fail for lack of standing. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically requested overtime compensation… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically requested overtime compensation… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:21 am by Josh Sturtevant
At the core of the debate, begun in the aftermath of the horrors of 9/11, is the question, 'to what extent are Americans willing to give up personal, even constitutional, freedoms in return for public safety.' The main competing theories (among many others) are easy to identify. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:06 am
  But unless and until that happens, the award stands and has the potential to be as much as trebled based upon the willfulness finding. [read post]