Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Board of Trustees of the California State University (2015) 239 Cal.App.4th 1258 (discussed here), Barker v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Board of Trustees of the California State University (2015) 239 Cal.App.4th 1258 (discussed here), Barker v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 9:32 am
Many states have reporting pay or call-in pay laws of their own that employers must follow. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 9:32 am
Many states have reporting pay or call-in pay laws of their own that employers must follow. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm
Mullan’s employment status. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:20 pm
A recent California case provides a nice illustration of how courts look at these situations and the facts upon which they focus. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:30 pm
California employment law recognizes two types of commissioned employees: (1) outside salespersons (Labor Code § 1171) and (2) inside salespersons (8 Cal.C.Regs. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:43 am
Writing in the July 27 issue of California Employment Law Letter, Schickman said, “The inherent problem is that these companies thrive on the basis of their brands and consistency. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
It is more properly viewed as being directed toward trade protection that is informed by US patent law. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Senator Warren’s bill would adopt a nationwide version of the California ReadyReturn system, which was designed by Stanford Law Professor Joseph Bankman. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 10:46 am
Now that California is a Ban the Box state, you no longer have to worry about employers dismissing you upon receiving your application. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 10:46 am
Now that California is a Ban the Box state, you no longer have to worry about employers dismissing you upon receiving your application. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm
Employers should be wary of using intrusive technologies if they suspect employee misuse of enterprise devices or data, two lawyers have told a privacy law conference. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
Forgive my painting with a broad brush here, but there are two general approaches to the enforcement of employment antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:51 am
For more information on the case, see Jeffrey Sloan’s article in the August 27, 2015, issue of California Employment Law Letter. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
Our opinion does not address whether the nature of defendant’s written comments, which were posted in his workplace, may subject him to discipline by his employer. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:42 am
And as he complained in a recent letter to the state Senate president, elected leaders are not doing anything to fix the problem. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 3:56 am
As the Franchise Law Committee points out, “Although Verdugo is an employment law matter, the same rationale and analysis should apply to any dispute involving a non-waivable California statute . . . [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:30 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
Federal and state laws, as well as the California Constitution, generally prohibit employers from making employment decisions based on marital status. [read post]
