Search for: "David M Williams"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2007, 2:17 pm
I'm very grateful. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
Horvath, Angela M. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:01 pm
Michael Abrashoff The Devil Drives - A Life of Sir Richard Burton, by Fawn M. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am
” In an op-ed for the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams names “the one Supreme Court opinion everyone should read”: Lucia v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
Horvath, Angela M. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:40 pm
I’m fine on all of that. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
David M. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:07 pm
Author William D. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 9:14 am
Perruso Power Company of Wyoming, LLC 06/17/2011 Richard M. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Moreover, as Smith explains, in Pennsylvania, one of the four states that used the word “all,” there was explicit discussion of whether “all” included federal elections: William Findley was a delegate to the Pennsylvania constitutional convention in 1789-90 and a member of the nine-member committee which reported the first draft of the constitution, which included the “all elections shall be by ballot” provision. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
An interesting and potentially important lawsuit in federal court in Arizona is challenging the way state officials have sought to deal with the vacancy in the US Senate created by Senator McCain’s death four months ago (on August 25, 2018). [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Yesterday the Federalism Working Group of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)—an influential and generally conservative policy-oriented institution that offers template legislation for state governments to consider adopting—was scheduled to meet to consider, among other things, a proposal that would empower state legislatures to add candidates to general election ballots for the office of United States Senator. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
And all nine justices seemed to agree that it would be impermissible to require a speaker to pay for security costs that arose because opponents to the speaker might show up and cause trouble; that would, said the justices, confer a “heckler’s veto” that would be inconsistent with the First Amendment’s core idea that unpopular speakers should not be shut down simply because they are in the minority (for the moment).The Court’s sentiments are quite understandable and… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Representing Appellees Doyle and Margaret M. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:54 am
Was it Williams? [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:13 am
William R. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:03 am
M. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 6:29 am
Posted by David F. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 5:58 am
Smith: I'm just a born worker. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
Briefly: At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Post pays tribute to Justice Ginsburg’s late husband, Marty, describing him as “truly one-of-a-kind. [read post]
