Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 12,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2013, 11:53 am
On things legal, McGovern reiterates the irrelevance problem—what does the ICRC stuff have to do with site visits? [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 1:46 pm
The FCC’s decision, however, does not affect Class A TV stations, which are still required to complete the digital transition by the September 1 deadline. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 2:45 pm
P. 4(a)(1)(B)(ii); Gist v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:22 pm
See 29 U.S.C. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:12 am
It also held that RLUIPA does not authorize damage claims against officials in their individual capacities.In United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:57 am
A trustee that does extraordinary work can apply to the court for a commission in excess of the statutory fee. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:33 pm
Oct. 29, 2012) (“Board Decision”). [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:00 am
Therefore the Court concludes that it does not enjoy protection as a collective trade mark. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:44 am
But, on proper interpretation, the claim does not go further than this. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 3:34 am
Precedential No. 1: TTAB Dismisses Opposition to TEQUILA Certification Mark ApplicationDiscovery/Evidence/Procedure: Precedential No. 32: TTAB Defers Decision on Motion to Strike Testimony DeclarationPrecedential No. 31: TTAB Dismisses Section 2(d) Claim Due to Lack of Use of Opposer's Foreign Mark in USAPrecedential No. 30: Party that Cross-Examines Testimony Declarant Bears The ExpensesPrecedential No. 29: TTAB Refuses to Disqualify Itself in TRUMP-Related Cancellation… [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm
" But it does not give "full weight" in its internal ranking metric to jobs that were funded by the law school. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 5:30 am
Thus, a noncitizen’s intent to use digital technology remotely from the United States in connection with preexisting employment abroad does not preclude eligibility for issuance of a nonimmigrant visa as a B-1 visitor for business or B-2 visitor for pleasure under INA § 101(a)(15)(B) as long as such intent is incidental to the lawful primary purpose of the temporary visit. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
See 33 U.S.C. § 908(i)(1). [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:09 pm
Section 215 sunsets on June 1, 2015. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:04 am
It is hard to argue that allowing to download from the internet is ‘making available to the public’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 and the CJEU does not expressly reject this conclusion. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 2:38 am
’The Court of Justice has just ruled as follows: "1. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:12 am
Broader than the common law test, broader than the recently announced test under the NLRA, broader than the OSHA test—the test for joint employment under the Fair Labor Standards Act (and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act) uses the same expansive “suffer or permit” language as does the FLSA’s definition of employment, stresses the DOL Wage and Hour Division’s Administrator’s Interpretation No. 2016-1 on joint employment.… [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:10 pm
§ 78u-6(h)(1). [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:18 am
Workers’ Compensation Law § 29(1) provides that, if an employee who is eligible for workers’ compensation benefits is injured “by the negligence or wrong of another not in the same employ, such injured employee . . . [read post]
