Search for: "Does 1-51"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 3,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
Instead, we will now have a modified comparative fault standard with a 51 percent bar. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:04 am
This is a Yankees blog that does a great job of capturing what it means to be a baseball fan. [read post]
Sunlight is the best disinfectant: open justice and company law proceedings in Ireland – Eoin O’Dell
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm
As a consequence, the Courts have held that, in the absence of statutory authority or constitutional requirement, the press can neither be excluded from an otherwise open hearing (Irish Times v Ireland [1998] 1 IR 359, [1998] 2 ILRM 161; De Gortari v Smithwick [1999] 4 IR 223, [2000] 1 ILRM 463, [1999] IESC 51 (25 June 1999)) nor be precluded from publishing information from that hearing such as the name of an accused (Independent Newspapers v Anderson [2006] 3 IR 341,… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:27 pm
In Vokes, a “widow of 51 years”1 sought to be relieved from her obligation to pay for dance lessons purchased from an Arthur Murray franchise. [read post]
21 May 2021, 6:39 am
Notes 1 – Pasadena Police Officers Assn. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
Thus, in Akasa the plaintiff presumably pays 51% of the co-op maintenance charges. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm
The outcome is a bit complex:1. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
This discussion, found in Chapter 51, has been revised and updated. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:07 pm
The agency does not favor public notification in all instances, only when time remains to make vaccinating restaurant employees or customers worthwhile. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:11 pm
As of January 1, 2024, any SDVOSB that does not have a pending certification application at SBA (or that has not been SBA-certified), will be ineligible for sole-source or set-aside federal procurements. 3. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am
According to the ECJ, Article 82(1) GDPR precludes a ‘national rule or practice’ that requires non-material damages to reach a ‘certain degree of seriousness’ (para. 51). [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:02 am
Superior Ct., 51 Cal.4th 310, 327 (2011). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 10:26 am
But that cooperation does not necessarily requir [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:25 am
Substantial evidencesupports the Board’s determination that the challengedclaims would not have been obvious over tworeferences: 1) U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
Section 105(1): In this Act- … "child" means, subject to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1, a person under the age of eighteen Note that paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 does not apply in this case. 'Child' or 'Child in Need'? [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
Section 105(1): In this Act- … "child" means, subject to paragraph 16 of Schedule 1, a person under the age of eighteen Note that paragraph 16 of Schedule 1 does not apply in this case. 'Child' or 'Child in Need'? [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
Thus each had committed an offence under s 72(1) of the 2004 Act. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Co., 51 AD3d 1014, 1017; cf. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
¶¶ 51, 67.) [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 2:51 pm
At first instance, HHJ Luba QC held that there was not necessarily any clash between the two precedents. 51. [read post]
