Search for: "HARDING v. HAND" Results 1301 - 1320 of 6,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am by SHG
Disparate impact isn’t proof of racism, but rather gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of racism because proof of racial animus is often hard to identify and so the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of Griggs v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The order, handed down on May 26, 2020 by Magistrate Judge John F. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
These observations are based on the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm by Masha Simonova
Barriers to Judicial Vindication of Constitutional Rights On Feb. 25, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
On the one hand, they can indignantly deny the charge, often reversing it. [read post]
They were dominated by strong, charismatic patriarchs, who ruled with an iron hand. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:09 pm by Giles Peaker
One of the points made by Foster J in her ruling was that “the (undated) photographs show, in one picture, a right hand/arm wearing a brace, in another a left hand/arm wearing one”. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The Small Business Administration (SBA) and Treasury Secretary Mnuchin have signaled that they want borrowers to think long and hard before certifying the necessity of the loan. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
Emergency Declaration No. 2020-002 covers transportation to meet immediate needs for: medical supplies and equipment related to the testing, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19; supplies and equipment necessary for community safety, sanitation, and prevention of community transmission of COVID-19 such as masks, gloves, hand sanitizer, soap and disinfectants; food, paper products and other groceries for emergency restocking of distribution centers or stores; immediate precursor raw materials… [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Indeed, the Reporter reaffirmed the Rules Committee’s substantive judgment that questions of sufficient basis and reliable application of methodology are admissibility issues:[20] “It is hard to see how expert testimony is reliable if the expert has not done sufficient investigation, or has cherry-picked the data, or has misapplied the methodology. [read post]