Search for: "Holiday v. State" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,357
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2014, 1:56 pm by Giles Peaker
The Tribunal accepted, too, that it was possible for a person to be resident in more that one place at a time, as found in AM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] UKUT 387 (AAC). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am by Laura Sandwell
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Dr. Mel Kramer
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the matter styled APHA v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:28 am
Around Christmas, I often blog about Ganulin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
He thought it “racist” to reserve a holiday for black Americans: Why not an Indian American holiday? [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am by Kevin LaCroix
In support of its position, the insurer relied on case law (including the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 opinion in Level 3 Communications Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am by Kevin LaCroix
In support of its position, the insurer relied on case law (including the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 opinion in Level 3 Communications Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by Laura H. Juillet
The provisions of the Equality Act 2010 (affording protection against unlawful discrimination) are, like those regarding holiday pay, derived from EU law. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by John Elwood
  There was some hope that the holiday break might allow the Court finally to move this thing, but alas, the petition that asks whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim has now spent more time at the Supreme Court than Associate Justice Thomas Johnson, by a nearly two-month margin. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:40 pm by Simon Fodden
Coyote, Plaintiff -v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
By taking time off on April 18 and 21, 2011, Castle would effectively be absent from the classroom for two weeks.As this absence would involve an extension of an existing school holiday, Employee was told that her request required the approval of the District Superintendent. [read post]