Search for: "Matter of Election Reform Amendment"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 3:10 am
Roche somehow impacts Patent Reform…it doesn’t. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm
“Ignoring research, objective experience and some of the most informed experts in the country, California’s elected officials pandered to the public’s fear of violent crime: campaigning and voting for some of the most punitive sentencing laws in the nation, including ‘three strikes,’ tolerating punitive parole policies and rejecting almost every meaningful reform effort no matter the political party of origin. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:40 am
A California court upheld an election reform measure much more disparate than the Florida redistricting measure against a single-subject challenge. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:39 am
Weekly D1079bDependent children -- Violation of “Stipulation for Plan of Treatment” -- General master did not have authority to conduct adjudicatory hearing under section 39.507, which requires that such hearings be conducted by judge -- Moreover, rule 8.257(h) prohibits general magistrate from presiding over adjudicatory hearing under section 39.507 -- Rule further provides that no matter shall be heard by general magistrate without appropriate order of referral -- Finally,… [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:00 am
The most recent development was the announcement of yet another Group to look in to this matter – see BBC 31st May 2011 The law reform group Justice have also weighed in. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:46 pm
Further, at paragraph 50, it noted: the interim tariff we adopt in this matter is not mandatory. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:36 pm
To the extent voting matters, it does so solely because it facilitates the market for corporate control. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:43 am
The adoption of a series of union friendly labor law reforms was one of the key campaign promises of President Obama during his election campaign. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:26 pm
In contrast, disputes over what this Article calls "governmental campaign speech" involve free speech clause and other challenges by private parties who seek instead to silence the government’s speech on matters subject to vote by members of the public or their elected representatives. [read post]
11 May 2011, 11:02 pm
It is possible that the government will hold off making these amendments so that it leaves some wiggle room for reform as the bill near its final stage. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:39 pm
Stamer has more than 23 years experience advising health industry clients about these and other matters. [read post]
6 May 2011, 12:44 pm
The importance of this matter cannot be overstated. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
Brussels I and Arbitration Revisited - The European Commission’s Proposal COM(2010) 748 final - Martin Illmer Abstract: In December 2010, the European Commission presented its long-awaited proposal for a reformed Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm
The question of what can and cannot be disclosed in relation to family proceedings is set out in the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 as amended, and from 6 April 2011 in the Family Procedure Rules 2010. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
What any such reform must keep within its sights is that Convention rights – any rights – are not defined independently of any variable. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm
matter? [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
He has been quoted in national news outlets hundreds of times, and appears regularly on national broadcast media on matters ranging from complex litigation to constitutional law to criminal justice. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Epstein, for National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, amicus curiae, submitted a brief. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
The Court thus cloaks in the rhetoric of volition a policy in tension with constitutionally-pedigreed access to justice and venerable principles of federalism.This Article documents the rhetoric-reality gap and explores why it exists and why it matters. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:54 am
That leads me to my friendly amendment. [read post]
