Search for: "Russell v. Ins*" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Orin Kerr
Disclosure: Kevin Russell, of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure:  Tom Goldstein of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., the publisher of this blog, argued Walden on behalf of the respondents; the firm's Kevin Russell was among the counsel to the petitioner in Fernandez.] [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:40 am
Another classic example is Designer Guild v Russell Williams, here, where the House of Lords had to repair the damage done by the Court of Appeal]. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
A v British Broadcasting Corporation, 22 and 23 January 2014 (Supreme Court) Ontulmus v Collett 5 and 6 February 2014 (Tugendhat J) NAB v Serco, 7 February 2014 (Bean J) [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:53 am by Lyle Denniston
Akamai Tehnologies – definition of inducement of others to infringe a patent (Justice Alito is recused) Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in Lane v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm by Cristina Tilley
The question before the Court in Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
  (Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in Lane.) [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:08 am by Kit Case
In 2013 one employee fraud case did crack the Top Ten, so the record is now 49-1 (employer fraud v. employee fraud) over the past five years. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:33 am by Lyle Denniston
[Disclosure:  The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents Edward Lane, the petitioner in Lane v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by John Elwood
  (Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in Lane.) [read post]