Search for: "STEVENS v. STATE" Results 1301 - 1320 of 7,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2008, 9:45 pm
The passage in question from Justice John Paul Stevens' dissent that is slightly misquoted in Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion actually states, "Even if the textual and historical arguments on both sides of the issue were evenly balanced, respect for the well-settled views of all of our predecessors on this Court, and for the rule of law itself, see Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by Rick Pildes
As I've noted here before, in early December the Supreme Court is going to engage one of the most important cases of the Term, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Erin Miller
 Justice Stevens dissents alone. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:25 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Paul.In Part III, we take head-on the argument that the "crush video" case, United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 1:12 pm by Michael Steven Green
In honor of the 75th anniversary of Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
The reasoning of these decisions varied at times, but the theme was consistent and widely understood that "a series of steps for conducting business could not be patented" (at pages 26-27 of his decision Justice Stevens cited several such cases including US Credit Sys Co v American Credit Indem Co (1893), Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co (1908), Loew's Drive-In Theatres, Inc v Park-In Theatres, Inc (1949)). [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Guest Blogger
  Like Chief Justice Roberts during oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
Harper:Members of this Court last discussed the outer bounds of state court review in the present context in Bush v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am by Andrew Hamm
Additional coverage comes from Steven Mazie for The Economist’s Democracy in America blog. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:54 am by Mark Tabakman
In a recent posting in the MS & K Employment Alert, Steven Schneider and Ivan Perkins wrote about the recent Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 6:29 am
Musk II for Executive Compensation and for Stockholder Ratification Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Saturday, February 15, 2025 Tags: Delaware Court of Chancery, Elon Musk, Executive Compensation, stockholders The Industry Veteran CEO: Friend or Foe? [read post]