Search for: "Smith v. California"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am
The justices also granted review on Friday in: Smith v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Securi [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 8:08 am
” “In 2019, Reed Smith began getting anonymous correspondence that seemed like “the musings of a disgruntled person who was following” the Providence v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:00 am
Such persons may be actual witnesses to an event in dispute, or they may have knowledge that is based on heresay See Smith v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:00 am
Such persons may be actual witnesses to an event in dispute, or they may have knowledge that is based on heresay See Smith v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Smith (1968). [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:44 am
Smith & Wollenskey Rest. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
This opinion is considerably narrower than Judge Walker’s opinion in the district court, and it relies very heavily on Romer v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
In People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
In People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:50 am
” Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:05 am
The class action lawsuit alleged that McDonald’s, alongside its franchisee, Smith Family LP, was in violation of California labor laws for its: Failure to pay overtime; Failure to maintain accurate records; Failure to reimburse workers for time they spent cleaning their uniforms. [read post]
3 May 2013, 7:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
A federal district court in California held that triable fact issues existed as to whether he was qualified for any of the four potential positions, whether his employer could have invoked the “special situations” provision of the union contract to override the seniority system, and whether it failed to engage in the interactive process by having only one meeting with him and interviewing him for only one job (Smith v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
Justice Smith in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
E.g., Smith v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
