Search for: "State v. Burns" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2017, 3:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The appeal turned primarily on Section 9.7 (b) of the operating agreement, which stated: Upon the death or disability of a Member (in the case of a Member who is an individual) . . . [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should have granted those branches of the petition which sought to compel disclosure of the documents sought in Plaintiff's FOIL requests that were the subject of this appeal. * New York State Public Officers Law Article 6. ** See Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454.*** The basic concept underlying FOIL is that all government documents and records, other than those having access specifically limited… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
  The Book of Genesis -- sort of the  Marbury v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
IPSO took six months to rule on the matter, during which time a case officer became so concerned about Hindley’s mental state that she sent her contact details for the Samaritans. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:35 am by Gallivan & Gallivan
Under New York Labor Labor Law, Part 23, Protection in Construction, Demolition, and Excavation Operations, New York State requires that appropriate eye protection be provided to individuals and must be used by all persons while employed in welding, burning or cutting operations or in chipping, cutting or grinding any material from which particles may fly, or while engaged in any other operation which may endanger the eyes. 12 NYCRR 23-1.8(a). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Burns, Judicial Corporal Punishment in the United States? [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 3:23 am by Jon Hyman
http://t.co/HgtvN2ksk3 — Chai Feldblum (@chaifeldblum) March 25, 2014 If you need any greater reminder of the need for the Employment Nondiscrimination Act (ENDA), which would amend Title VII to include sexual orientation and gender identity, look no further than Burns v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
Indeed by shrink wrapping the building, State Auto benefited because the wedding season revenue was not impacted by the burned-out building. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted review in United States v. [read post]