Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 1301 - 1320 of 9,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2022, 12:09 pm by Phil Dixon
The post Case Summaries: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (April 2022) appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am by Jan von Hein
The following comments first recall the role of restatements in American law. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court upheld an essentially identical state law in the 1965 case of Cox v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:32 am by Josh Blackman
Circuit Court of Appeals and chair of the Judicial Conference of the United States' budget committee. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am by Bernard Bell
  The Court “assume[d] without deciding that the first factor would weigh in Vaz’s favor. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Supreme Court is the only court in the country that is not required to abide by a judicial code of ethics. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(It’s not impossible to imagine a federal district court embracing them, but the chances for success go down the farther up the appellate ladder one proceeds.) [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
  RUSSIA, UKRAINE – INTERNATIONAL CRIMES A Russian soldier in Ukrainian custody will be the first to stand trial on war-crimes charges, Ukraine’s prosecutor-general said yesterday, after an investigation alleged he fatally shot an unarmed 62-year-old man. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am by John Elwood
The Axon district court dismissed the suit for want of jurisdiction, concluding that Congress had implicitly precluded district-court jurisdiction over such actions by creating a statutory review scheme for FTC cease-and-desist orders that bypasses district courts and vests judicial review directly in the courts of appeals. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
On October 26, 2021, in the case of Ex Parte Lowry, the First District [Texas] Court of Appeals held that Section 43.262 was facially unconstitutional. [read post]