Search for: "State v. Nelson "
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm
Thus, the measure was nearly identical to the ban in federal law that was struck down by the Supreme Court in January of last year in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
In State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
In State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
And United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:59 am
Garcia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm
The amicus brief was filed in Lissack v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
”This conception of clemency is continuous with a line of cases going back to the first United States Supreme Court case on clemency in 1833.That case, United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Allen and Slone each filed a state-court action against HHC. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:36 pm
” The court traces Puerto Rico path to becoming a “possession” of the United States, observing that the underlying definition of marriage did not change. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:27 am
Under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Daimler AG v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:52 am
Hoffman is accused of fraudulently selling $3.3M of unregistered securities, along with childhood friend Thomas V. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
United States and General Dynamics v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac… [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:31 pm
Port of London Authority v Paul Mendoza [2017] UKUT 146 (TCC). [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
In addition to this, all state public defender cases are included. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
" Nelson v. [read post]
