Search for: "State v. Tech" Results 1301 - 1320 of 5,365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2009, 8:21 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
P. 12(b)(6) (stating that a complaint may be dismissed for `failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted’). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm by Fred Chung
In United Therapeutics Corp. v Liquidia Tech Inc., the Federal Circuit reviewed the district court’s decision on invalidity and infringement of two pharmaceutical patents and the impact of the Final Written Decision (FWD) in a parallel inter-partes review (IPR) upon the district court’s decision. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
The first to enact an anti-“Big Tech,” anti-Section 230 law was Florida, with Senate Bill 7072. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:26 pm by Andis Kaulins
Texas State: Red Raiders favored by 17 Our call: Texas Tech 24-23    Result: - UTEP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
High Tech Prod Inc    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitKAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]