Search for: "THE COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANY"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 4:21 pm
There is significant uncertainty, however, about the nature and scope of the insurance products available to cover a company’s technology and cyber privacy risks. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
Being wrong in my predictions puts me in good company, however - the decision surprised most court watchers. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
Being wrong in my predictions puts me in good company, however - the decision surprised most court watchers. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:10 am
Section 541.151 of the Texas Insurance Code limits the rights of an insured person to bring claims under the DTPA against an insurance company only for the false, misleading or deceptive acts that are set forth in 17.46(b) of the Texas Business and Commerce Code. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
ACA also allows the federal government to more closely regulate how insurance companies communicate plan information to customers. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:04 pm
Aside from his personal investment in the case, and his loyalty to the President, Verrilli deeply believes that the law is important to secure health insurance coverage for millions of Americans who otherwise cannot afford it, and he knows that the next few minutes could determine their fate. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 5:29 am
Barnett Now that the Obama health plan is law, more than a dozen states are asserting that Congress has exceeded its Commerce Clause power in imposing a mandate on individuals to purchase health insurance from private companies. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Can Congress use the Spending Clause to Steward Machine Company v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Will the Court’s decision to base the health insurance part of its opinion on one part of the Constitution –– the federal government’s power to tax –– instead of another part of the Constitution –– the federal government’s power to pass laws over interstate commerce –– affect any other laws already on the books? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
But, for the reasons explained above, the Commerce Clause does not give Congress that power. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
- to approach this analysis without my usual limited-government-libertarian blinders on and instead merely look at the decision as good or bad for the rule of law from the viewpoint of a legal practitioner and someone who understands how lawyers try to interpret the law in order to provide their principals (be they companies, politicians or ordinary citizens) sound advice regarding the legal implications of their future decisions. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:03 am
Similarly, throwing coins at politicians while insurance companies and their allies throw millons of dollars isn’t a fair fight. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:25 pm
If the company turns out the lights, does the Commerce Clause power dry up until Monday? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
” Rearden Commerce, Inc., is “a Silicon Valley-based business concierge company. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:39 am
The Obama administration has already promised to permit each state “maximum flexibility” in regulating insurance companies within the exchanges, and in structuring the exchanges themselves. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:41 am
Justice Samuel Alito wondered whether Congress could require people to carry burial insurance. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:14 am
It will wreak havoc with the scheme of requiring insurance companies to sell to persons with pre-existing conditions without charging extra. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:18 pm
We had to bring stakeholders in from private sector, insurance companies, nurses, doctors. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
And the idea is that while the government can command health insurance companies to do lots of things when they are already acting in interstate commerce, it can’t issue commands to individuals who are not engaged in the sort of activity at issue. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:53 pm
The law also limits insurance companies’ ability to raise premiums for individuals who are already covered. [read post]
