Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:56 am
(collectively, “Apotex”) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida finding that: (1) Apotex’s U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:21 am by Bill Otis
Lynch, who is the United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, to request that she vacate two of Mr. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
 . when an article he places on the market” is defective. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  Take the religious objection to the federal minimum wage at issue in Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
 The right these plaintiffs seek is not a new right, but a right that these individuals have always been guaranteed by the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am by Schachtman
 The Nazis invoked cultural arguments, explicitly or implicitly to reject “Jewish” science; religious groups in the United States invoke religious and political considerations to place creationism on an equal or superior footing with evolution; anti-vaccine advocacy groups embrace case reports over rigorous epidemiologic analyses. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:32 pm by Cappetta Law Offices
Under Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:47 am
  And, since the False Claims Act allows a private individual to prosecute FCA actions, the qui tam suit was brought by and on behalf of both the sales representative and the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am by Jani
Under common law a mark is protectable through its use, or as was stated by Justice Pitney in United Drug Co v Theodore Rectans Co: "...the right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption; its function is simply to designate the goods as the product of a particular trader and to protect his good will against the sale of another's product as his". [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:20 am by Jeff Welty
United States, __ F.3d __, 2014 WL 2699722 (4th Cir. [read post]