Search for: "United States v. Edward" Results 1301 - 1320 of 2,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:33 am by Dave Maass
John Conyers Jr., (D-MI), ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee David Segal, executive director of Demand Progress Maggie Gyllenhaal, actor and activist Oliver Stone, director of The Untold History of the United States and Nixon John Cusack, actor and activist Wil Wheaton, actor and writer Molly Crabapple, artist and writer Jesselyn Radack, U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
Edward Livingston Trudeau founded the Saranac Laboratory for the Study of Tuberculosis, in 1884, as a center for research and treatment of tuberculosis. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Also in FISC-related transparency news: the FISC declassified as much as it could of its latest business records telephony metadata program; I wrote about two issues dealt with in that order: Judge Claire Eagan’s “relevance” analysis in her August memorandum, and addressing Supreme Court Justices opinions in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Clara Spera
But, in an apparent blow to NSA, United States District Court Judge Jeffrey White has denied the Justice Department’s request to suspend legal action in the case of First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:48 am by Laura C. Nagi
”  While Edwards' appeal was pending, the Third Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 11:41 am by Schachtman
Personnel records allowed me to establish that Onondaga Pottery had hired a young scientist, Edward Schramm, in the 1930’s, from the United States Bureau of Standards. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:55 am by Raffaela Wakeman
United States; Jess Bravin of the Journal was there, too. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am by Schachtman
First, the district saw through the argument that the claimed benzene-APL LNT model was good science because the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relies upon it. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 By way of rejoinder, the United States insisted that the parties had not relied upon the documents, before the lower court or in their appeals briefing. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Since the United States Supreme Court recognized agency amicus interpretations as a source of controlling law entitled to deference in Auer v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 4:10 pm
ECUSA's strategy is geared toward getting an appropriate case into the United States Supreme Court, in its own good time. [read post]