Search for: "United States v. Warne" Results 1301 - 1320 of 5,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2006, 4:08 am
See Brief For United States As Amicus Curiae, Buckman Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 3:09 pm by Cappetta Law Offices
The United States Court of Appeals was charged with deciding whether CROCS pose a heightened risk of escalator entrapment, thus rendering the footwear defective. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  In a prominent legal challenge to the Food and Drug Administration’s proposed tobacco warnings, for instance, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia displayed a form of literalism in responding to these warnings. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
I would, though, like to quote from the end of the decision, as the court uses language that could serve as a warning to our own legislators, who are treating the full faith and credit of the United States as a bargaining chip: One need not have what Argentina’s great gift to literature termed a “case of prodigious memory” to recall the Republic’s appalling record of keeping its promises to its creditors. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:26 pm by Florian Mueller
Yesterday three U.S. government agencies--the Antitrust Division (ATR) of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--invited stakeholders to submit comments by early January on a new draft policy statement on standard-essential patents (SEPs).I applaud the Biden Administration for taking--at least this stage--a very centrist position. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 5:18 am by Michael Rosenblat
The district court however relied on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals case, United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]