Search for: "Wells v. Wise"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 2,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2010, 4:56 pm
Second, there is the case of Curran v Scottish Daily Record ([2010] ScotCS CSHOH 44) in which temporary judge Morag Wise QC dismissed an action arising out of an interview given by Mr Tommy Sheridan MSP in which he criticised the pursuer, another MSP and other individuals in the Scottish Socialist Party, referring to them as “political scabs”. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:37 pm
., Bloom v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:15 pm
(Medicines v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
The reversal in course in California v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 9:05 am
In Rose v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:22 pm
City of Chicago and Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:44 pm
In Bond v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:48 am
(Swinney v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:25 pm
A recent example is Lemaster v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 10:32 am
See Wollen v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:39 am
The recent cases of World Wise Partners Ltd v RBTT (2008) and Smith v NCB (2008) were cited as examples. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:40 am
V. acknowledges earlier that the empirics he surveys are inconclusive. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
Aldrich v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm
Well that day has come. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
"Advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise, and all courses may run ill. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:08 pm
The decision of the European Court of Justice in Svensson v Retriever Sverige AB (Case C‑466/12, 13 February 2014) has established some important points about the legality of linking under EU copyright law: A clickable direct link to a copyright work made freely available on the internet with the authority of the copyright holder does not infringe. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:19 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 2:36 pm
Berman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:21 am
“The question is not whether the challenged conduct is efficient, well-functioning, or wise. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:15 pm
., U.S. v. [read post]
