Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
The Court’s most recent federal Indian law decision, United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
After the state urged the Court not to hear that case, the Justices then called for a response by the state. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm
Well into his stride Tugendhat stated that “no case of public interest had been advanced before herself. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) - read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State the Home Department in this case. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Although BIO and the undersigned higher education associations held different views on the Stanford v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Unsurprisingly, the Divisional Court followed the clear ruling by the House of Lords in Kay v London Borough of Lambeth [2006] AC 465 that domestic rules of precedent applied. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
Lumba A similar question had been addressed by the court in R (Lumba) v Secrteary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 – another case involving the detention of a foreign national prisoner. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Kerr v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
The decision in McCaughey will not impose a Human Rights Act obligation on the state to investigate pre-commencement deaths, as had been argued in McKerr. [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:04 am
” This principle was then fleshed out in Prebble v Television New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 AC 321 : …the courts and Parliament are both astute to recognise their respective constitutional roles. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
The meaning of “miscarriage of justice” in s. 133 was previously considered by the House of Lords in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 18; [2005] 1 AC 1. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
The solution to this dilemma is now found in the Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd ([2001] 2 AC 127). [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
(State ex rel. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:34 pm
Arris Group, Inc. v. [read post]
