Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 1321 - 1340 of 29,811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2016, 4:30 am by Sean Gallagher
While it bets its future on the stealth of the F-22 and F-35 fighters, that stealth has come at a cost: reduced weapon loads. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:36 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  In that regard, the Federal Western District Court of Pennsylvania ruled that "[i]f the underlying complaint contains more than one cause of action, and one of them would constitute a claim within the scope of the policy's coverage, the insurer must defend the complaint until it can confine the claim to a recovery excluded from the scope of the policy. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:30 am
Cuevas-Sanchez, 821 F.2d 248 (5th Cir. 1987) (defendants manifested a subjective expectation of privacy by erecting a ten-foot-high metal fence). [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:39 pm
One Piece of Real Property Located at 5800 SW 74th Ave., Miami, Fla., 363 F.3d 1099, 1102-03 (11th Cir. 2004) (police refused defendant's request to speak with attorney, to make telephone call, and to get more clothes because defendant was in only a towel, and told defendant that if they had to wait for a warrant they would "tear his house apart and arrest his girlfriend"). [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:47 am by Christine Corcos
I argue that this line of response is not very firm, and a better way to defend the separation thesis is to see it as an answer to the question of what makes it the case that an o counts as an F in the relevant society. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:47 am
I argue that this line of response is not very firm, and a better way to defend the separation thesis is to see it as an answer to the question of what makes it the case that an o counts as an F in the relevant society. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:23 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Mount, 675 F.3d 1052, 1055–57 (7th Cir.2012) (application of additional one level decrease in defendant's offense level under § 3E1.1 is mandatory). [read post]
”  The District Court found that after the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation in the instant MDL, the MDL court in In re Darvocet, 106 F. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 8:39 pm
Wiley, 847 F.3d 480, 481 (8th Cir. 1988) (defendant lacked standing when he had no legitimate access to premises without the presence of the owner and had no personal belongings stored there). [read post]
  Despite this fact, the Third Circuit noted that, “[f]requently,” discovery in collective actions “focuses on the named plaintiffs and a subset of the collective group,” a limitation that may hinder defendants’ ability to present individualized defenses that may not be applicable to all opt-in plaintiffs. [read post]