Search for: "Doe Nos." Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,061
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2014, 9:25 pm
Patent Nos. 6,022,329 (“’329 patent”), 6,179,807 (“’807 patent”), and 7,144,383 (“’383 patent”) were valid and willfully infringed. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 10:33 am by José Guillermo
ESTOS DATOS ESTÁN EN EL SISTEMA y no necesitan PEDIR PRUEBAS.2) QUE PRUEBAS QUIEREN QUE LES PRESENTE UN CERTIFICADO MÉDICO QUE ME CUESTA  "x" soles, que les acompañe la Partida de Matrimonio, ¡¡¡VIVIMOS JUNTOS, PEDAZOS DE IMBÉCILES" hace 49 Años CASADOS POR LA  IGLESIA Y POR CIVIL, NO NECESITAN  QUE LES PRUEBE NADA.3) Recuerdan la odisea que vivimos mi esposa y yo cuando NO le daban sus medicinas, EL PADOMI NO… [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 8:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., 2021 WL 1236106, Nos. 17 Civ. 6261 (VM) & 20 Civ. 4316 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:19 am
This Kat is not impressed: does the fact that the words iPad and iPhone are in capital letters detract from the fact they are being used as generic terms for tablet computers and internet-enabled mobile phones respectively -- and who should know better than OHIM, which has granted CTMs to Apple for each of them (see eg Nos EU008817281 and 004748133).Congratulations! [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 8:33 pm
Sandra’s solitude is a natural behavior to her species which does not mean ill-treatment or any sign of sadness. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:03 am
However, it failed to show that Plaintiff does not sell its goods through some of the same channels of trade as Defendant proposed to exclude from Plaintiff's registration. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 8:32 am by Mathews P. George
Even misspelt generic name is generic if it does not change the generic significance to the buyer [Mc.Carthy on Trade Marks and Unfair Competition (Third Edn. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:47 pm
Randall cited four U.S. patents (Nos. 1,148,382; 2,752,864; 2,866,419; and 4,019,442) that disclose bulkheads designed to be lifted and stowed near the ceiling, three of which (the ’382, ’864, and ’419 patents) describe such stowage for movable, track-mounted panels. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:41 pm
 The State of Kerala [Criminal Appeal Nos. 1584-1585 of 2014] (“Govindaswamy”), pronounced on 15.09.2016. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:33 am
Southern Illinois Miners, LLC, Oppositions Nos. 91183196 and 91183698 (March 13, 2014) [precedential].The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) plays 16 collegiate sports, but it has not fielded a baseball team in 20 years. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:57 am by John Jascob
Accordingly, the petitions for review were denied.The consolidated cases are Nos. 15-1149 and 15-1150. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 9:41 am by Marcel Pemsel
The French Cour de Cassation asked the Court of Justice of the EU (‘CJEU’) whether a trade mark is deceptive if it does not mislead about characteristics of the goods and services, but rather about the company offering these goods and services (Fauré Le Page, case C-412/24). [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The appealed order, purporting to clarify the parties' rights under the arbitration agreement, does not fall within any of the types of appealable orders identified under either the state or federal statutes. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:45 pm by Unknown
," Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, vol. 39, no. 8 (Dec. 2021) [free full-text] - Author = US "Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes in Immigrants from Conflict-Zone Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies," Frontiers in Public Health, 11 March 2022 [open access] - Authors (6) = Norway (2, incl. lead), Iran (3), Denmark (1) "Period poverty: menstrual health hygiene issues among adolescent and young Venezuelan migrant… [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, Case Nos. 12-3169, 12-3182 & 3420. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court, Case Nos. 11–338 and 11–347. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:25 pm
” Based on this comparison, it has been argued that the BWSSB decision does not form a judgment in the eyes of the law because of the circumstances of the case. [read post]