Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 1321 - 1340 of 6,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2009, 11:37 am
 Does the court in question have jurisdiction to hear torts, product liability or tax cases? [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:44 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Newton concluded that both hip replacements resulted in a “good result” and assigned pursuant to Tables 17-34 and 17-33, 15% WPI for the right hip, 15% WPI for the left hip, and 7% WPI for the lumbar spine (utilizing the DRE method). [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:51 pm by Sarah Aberg and Pouneh Almasi
”[6] The Exchange Act provides a two-step test to assess whether a trading system meets the definition of an exchange: does the system bring together the orders for securities of multiple buyers and sellers; and does the system use established, non-discretionary methods (whether by providing a trading facility or by setting rules) under which such orders interact with each other, and the buyers and sellers entering such orders agree to the terms of the trade.[7]… [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 12:40 pm by Tom Lamb
On the FDA’s Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) public dashboard, the agency has tracked 33 reports of ileus from GLP-1 users, with two deaths.... [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Hester M. Peirce
Although the Agenda includes rules that might regulate crypto protocols or platforms through an unmarked backdoor,[21] it does not appear to include any rules primarily intended to grapple with the main regulatory questions that have arisen around these assets.[22] II. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Beth Graham
My findings show that review for “manifest disregard” does not erode finality. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
I think our system both encourages and does not discourage acts of judicial arrogance. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
G.S. 14–33, in its entirety, prohibits varying types of assault, batteries and affrays as follows:§ 14–33. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:01 pm by Jeff Gittins
The bill inserts language into the statute to provide (1) that one or more successive overlapping change applications do not protect a water right that is already subject to forfeiture due to nonuse, and (2) that the approval of one or more nonuse applications does not constitute beneficial use of the water for purposes of calculating the 15-year period during which a forfeiture action must be brought. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 9:48 am by Daniel Shaviro
(See Figure 1, at page 33 of the paper, for a visual depiction of an equilibrium at which the % actually cooperating equals the % that are willing to cooperate at that level of cooperation.)I gather that philosophers have questioned this set-up, saying you aren't actually a Kantian if you're being conditional about it. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
  (1) The fair use of a work is not an infringement of the rights conferred by this Part. [read post]