Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 3,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
It must generally be given limited weight, but “will have greater weight if it is unequivocal in the sense of being consistent with only one of the two alternative interpretations that generated the ambiguity triggering its admissibility”: Shewchuk at para 54. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:40 am
The recently enacted provision on the conflict of laws of agency does not contain any ruling on this problem (Art. 8 Introductory Act to the Civil Code). [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
A 1% annual fee may seem like a small amount but if you’re only earning 5% each year after inflation, does it seem reasonable to hand over 20% of your return to a company that should be managing your account with computer software? [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
It must generally be given limited weight, but “will have greater weight if it is unequivocal in the sense of being consistent with only one of the two alternative interpretations that generated the ambiguity triggering its admissibility”: Shewchuk at para 54. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
" (see p 54). [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
Since the effective date for the subject-matter of the main request was the filing date of the patent, namely 16 February 2005, the public prior use was state of the art pursuant to Article 54(2) EPC and it destroyed the novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1.The case should not be remitted to the opposition division if the Board finds the priority invalid. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
Since the effective date for the subject-matter of the main request was the filing date of the patent, namely 16 February 2005, the public prior use was state of the art pursuant to Article 54(2) EPC and it destroyed the novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1.The case should not be remitted to the opposition division if the Board finds the priority invalid. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:24 am
The Constitution in Article III, Section 1 9(1) reads that effective upon its ratification, “The death penalty shall not be imposed unless for compelling reasons, including heinous crimes the Congress hereafter provides for it. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Sovereign conduct on the margins of the law, the title of the Symposium for which this Article was produced,[1] is perhaps no better manifested than in the commercial activities of states. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
The Model Law does not have a consent provision attached to that article, but it does expressly permit this kind of addition generally. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 9:57 am
Income tax after credits (the measure of “income taxes paid” above) does not account for the refundable portion of EITC. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 6:17 pm
But Sotomayor argued that (a)(1) allows the court to take either of those steps, leaving little work for (a)(2). [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 11:51 am
Equivalence can be determined by the Registrar by notice on the FSB website whether any particular form of remuneration or consideration complies or does not comply with the principle. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:11 am
The 3rd Circuit’s suggestion that Elsa should have obtained a Rule 54(b) certification was misplaced, because that rule does not apply when one action (11-54) is resolved in its entirety. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:58 am
Redwine, Does It Hurt to Get Slapped? [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 7:55 am
(Also, it should be noted that copyright law does not require a work to be original in the sense of being novel—or the first to create the expression. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
(Art. 1 ¶¶1-2, 4). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
IRS does not collect comments or messages on this site. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 6:41 pm
(Today’s guest post is by Professor Jorge L. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:53 am
”[17] The dissent disagreed with this interpretation and stated that the “general concept of ‘living together’ does not fall directly under any of the rights and [guarantees] . . . within the Convention. [read post]
