Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 7,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Golden State Protections: Required Employee Reimbursements Under § 2802 of the California Labor Code
13 Jun 2012, 3:47 pm
Being forced to pay without reimbursement for mileage to transport goods from one store to another, as was the issue in question in the 2009 case of Stuart v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:20 am
In Segura v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 11:29 am
Good. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:49 pm
The Court of Appeal likes good briefs. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:58 am
AB 1513, if approved, would make it even more difficult for California employers to pay employees on a piece-rate basis. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
Ames, 188 U.S. 321 (1903) (Commerce power extended to prohibiting commerce in certain goods, in this case shipping Paraguayan lottery tickets across state lines); Swift and Company v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 5:04 pm
The California Supreme Court Decision The disappointing California Supreme Court decision, Lewis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:26 pm
The Idaho case is State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
This is just one more reason that we need the Supreme Court to review the issue.The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:29 am
Section 1708.85 of the California Civil Code is California’s sui generis prohibition on the distribution of non-consensual pornography, and it includes a private right of action. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 6:09 am
Finding good cause, the court granted plaintiff’s request. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:36 am
Hill), United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California, Case No. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:12 am
The first “suitable seating” case has gone to finally gone to trial in United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am
Section 1983”; (3) “damages under the California Unruh Civil Rights Act”; (4) breach of contract; and (5) breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The seminal case, Greenman v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
The causation ruling in Hardeman comes on the heels of a landmark verdict in a Roundup case in California state court – Johnson v. [read post]
