Search for: "Harris v. Hand"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2022, 1:35 pm
Amanda Rice argues remotely in Lange v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But government doctors must be particularly careful: on the one hand, they are professionally and morally obligated to provide the best practicable medical care to their patients; on the other hand, because they are public actors, decisions they make based on racial classifications are subject to strict judicial scrutiny—among the most skeptical and unforgiving forms of judicial second guessing known to American law. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:43 am
” Breyer agreed, pointing to the aftermath of Bush v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The case, Lawyers Funds for Client Protection v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
” Judges, on the other hand, should “apply rather than alter” the law; a judge who likes all of the outcomes in his cases, Gorsuch suggested, “is a bad judge. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Paul V. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 12:00 pm
Drawing on the landmark 1819 case of McCulloch v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
"We conclude that there does exist a sufficient link," noting that in Loving v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
Supp. 3d 1, 4 (D.D.C. 2019); see also Harris v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm
Dow Jr. wrote in an Oct. 9 memo in Timber Hill LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:06 pm
On the other hand, many other identified carve-outs, such as fraud and sale are very relevant to residential properties. [20] Several questions arise as to some of the carve-outs that would still be possible, but arise out of situations that are not typically default conditions on a residential loan. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:59 pm
” Bilski v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
E.g., Matthews v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
Matter of Potter v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
But see DeLuca v. [read post]
