Search for: "Hunt v. State" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am by Howard Wasserman
Did Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Scalia vote as they did in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:53 am by Rosalind English
Switzerland (no. 2) no. 32772/02, § 92, ECHR 2009 (rearing of animals)[Grand Chamber- GC]; Steel and Morris v . the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, §§ 89 and 95, ECHR 2005-II (fast-food meat industry); Hashman and Harrup v . the United Kingdom[GC], no. 25594/94 (hunting saboteurs); Steel and Others v . the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998 (hunting saboteurs); Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v . [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Quv4lL… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am by Wessen Jazrawi
XX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 742 (15 June 2012). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:51 am by Brandon Kain
Certain torts require proof of intentional misconduct (inducing breach of contract) or malice (malicious prosecution), while others require only a lack of reasonable care (negligence) or give rise to strict liability (the Rylands v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
Jeremy Hopkins has joined Riverview Law as Director of Operations – he also blogs, enthusiastically and amusingly, at Clerkingwell #WithoutPrejudice 26: Spectator contempt – Hunt / Warsi and The Ministerial Code – The Case for ‘Code’ Lawcast 206: Solicitor Nicky Richmond on Property and the Insurance sector, the changing legal landscape and food. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Whether the claimant must prove not only that the defendant was enriched but also that he suffered loss is somewhat controversial, though the prevailing view is that he does not (see for example Sempra Metals; BP v Hunt). [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Walker, 11-1011, another Sixth Circuit state-on-top habeas case, which presents a question left open two Terms ago in Wood v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:59 am by Harry Styron
The Missouri Court of Appeal’s decision in Teasdale & Associates v. [read post]