Search for: "In Re Application for Water Rights"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 1,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
Our economy, our health and our culture are built on the coastline and the gulf waters. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:01 am
Add the water and call it a day. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:55 am
(Signature) (Testator) (Insert date) [2] Personal representatives and conflict-of-interest transactions: Personal representatives are fiduciaries, which means they’re subject to all the duties generally applicable to trustees, including the duty to avoid conflicts of interest. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:29 am
Dithers overheard Dagwood at the water cooler telling his co-workers what a big jerk Mr. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 8:53 am
” I suspect your intuition – the conduct is potentially problematic – is right on target. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 7:22 am
(Hey, they're for-profit companies.) [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:00 am
Check whether you have applicable cancellation insurance. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:24 pm
That was one idea (the Seaface) that was thrown out of which we’re not pursuing. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:00 am
It’s proved a profitable form of diversification for Wonderful — which also owns Fiji Water and Justin Vineyards — at a time when almond prices are falling and water supplies are tight. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:46 am
On April 7, 1994, Foster Parent filled out an application with the defendants wherein she stated she worked the night shift at Thorek Hospital. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:54 am
On April 7, 1994, Foster Parent filled out an application with the defendants wherein she stated she worked the night shift at Thorek Hospital. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas), Three-strikes scheme… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In fact, the Supreme Court tackled a closely related issue in case that’s now more than four decades old: Los Angeles Department of Water & Power v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
So far many plaintiffs have had trouble coming up with factual support to back such allegations – and sometimes we’re not even sure why they’re making them. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:16 pm
Section 102, "National Nanotechnology Program Amendments" would require, within 12 months of the bill's enactment into law, of a strategic plan to guide the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) in achieving activities described in an earlier section and to guide the activities described under subsection (b) that specifies near-term and long-term objectives for the Program, the anticipated time frame for achieving the near-term objectives, and the metrics to be used for… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Polihonki, No. 07-2106 A sentence imposed following revocation of defendant's supervised release is affirmed over defendant's claim that the sentence, which was two months longer than the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range, was both procedurally and substantively unreasonable. . [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
The lodestar of this inquiry should no longer be the formerly paramount "natural" right of states to preserve themselves; it should be a transparent recognition of the difficult tradeoffs required by the - sometimes mutually exclusive - global policies, social interests, and human rights recognized by contemporary international law. [read post]
