Search for: "Jones v. United States" Results 1321 - 1340 of 3,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm by Donald Thompson
Neither our Court nor the United States Supreme Court has held, and I would not now hold, that a two-way-television encounter is "face to face" in this sense. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:00 am by Holly Jones, Senior Legal Editor
” The proclamation restricts entry to the United States of nationals of countries of “identified concern,” including several majority-Muslim nations. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:00 am by Holly Jones, Senior Legal Editor
” The proclamation restricts entry to the United States of nationals of countries of “identified concern,” including several majority-Muslim nations. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:43 pm by James Beard
The decision is one of the first Circuit Court decisions to address punitive damages availability in a Jones Act or unseaworthiness action since the Supreme Court of the United States’ land mark decision in Atlantic Soundings v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:45 pm by Ann Marie Marciarille
A 1979 United States Middle District of Florida injunction prohibiting the release of Medicare data that would identify specific physicians in the name of protection of physician privacy interests  (under the Privacy Act of 1974 and in response to Florida Medical Association, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:09 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Reed and Lord Lloyd-Jones gave the judgment, with whom all members of the Court agreed. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am by Matthew Scarola
United States, which threw] into doubt his 2006 conviction for fraud and conspiracy. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In September 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed that holding in Jones v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by CAFE
United States ,1944 An article in the Washington Post on court nominees refusing to answer questions about Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
The court also ordered appointment of counsel for plaintiff.In Jones v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 535 U.S. 43 (2002)," and concluded that "the suspension provision applies here only if the Franchise Tax Board was precluded from collecting the debt by a stay of proceedings" during the Debtor's prior Ch. 13 case. [read post]