Search for: "Miller, v. United States"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am
United States, in which the Court is considering whether a commercial fisherman can be convicted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s “anti-shredding” provision for ordering that seventy-two undersized fish be thrown overboard, comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist, Jonathan Keim at the National Review Online, and Mark Miller at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:42 am
In a podcast at Oral Argument, Joe Miller and Christian Turner discuss Armstrong v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
United States, 14-5227, and Freidus v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:47 pm
United States, No. 87-cv-0754-LFO, 1988 WL 8271, the court agreed that “[i]t would make the collection of taxes chaotic if a taxpayer could bypass the remedies provided by Congress simply by bringing a damage action against [IRS] employees. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
United States, 14-29, involving a prosecution under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, or the ’34 Act, as we old-timers call it (rescheduled for this Friday’s Conference); and Crews v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 1:32 pm
13 Oct 2014, 6:15 am
Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 7:03 pm
” Additionally, Levine relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
United States, raises questions about how courts should define so-called “true threats” that fall outside First Amendment protection and thus are subject to punishment. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:40 am
Mantich, in which the Court had been asked to consider whether its decision in Miller v. [read post]
