Search for: "People v Davis" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,044
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 9:29 pm by Jennifer Lynch
And such a ruling appears contrary to the California Constitution, which not only mandates that the public has a constitutional right to government records but also requires that statutes and other authorities, such as the law involved in our case, “shall be broadly construed if they further the people’s right of access, and narrowly construed if they limit the right of access. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Mary Ziegler is Martin Luther King Professor of Law, University of California, Davis. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  What we do know is that Speaker Bill Davis apparently does not have a bank account, or has not reported one, which is perhaps unsurprising for someone whose name is a conveniently untraceable alias. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:18 am by Gabriel Chin
The Supreme Court heard argument on Monday by telephone in Pham v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In such cases, the Supreme Court has made clear in Washington v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The trial in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics was heard by Nicola Davies J on 23, 24 and 27 July 2018. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Capilano Honey Ltd v Dowling [2016] NSWSC 1441 Davies J made further orders requiring the defendant to remove material from a website. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Conservatives have said that they want to give people the power to demand that social media sites delete material that was posted when the user was under eighteen. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicola Davies J concluded the hearing of the CMC in the case of Building Register v Weston. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am by Betty Lupinacci
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]