Search for: "STATE v B J J J" Results 1321 - 1340 of 6,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An application for retirement benefits must be timely delivered to and received by the retirement system to be operative Biscardi v New York State and Local Retirement Sys., 2016 NY Slip Op 03238, Appellate Division, Third Department Valerie J. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Dismissing a human rights complaint for "administrative convenience" and "dismissal of a human rights complaint on the merit" distinguishedVetro v Hampton Bays Union Free School Dist., 2017 NY Slip Op 01910, Appellate Division, Second Department In an action seeking to recover damages for his alleged wrongful termination of employment by the Hampton Bays Union Free School District, Frank J. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Revisiting the SEC’s Proxy Advisor Rule Posted by Paul Rose and Christopher J. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:30 am by Jay Yurkiw
Form of production RPM Pizza, LLC, d/b/a Domino’s Pizza v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
Upholding the constitutional validity of the Act, and following State of A.P. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 4:31 am by thejaghunter
Morgan making a cell phone call to state officials, during which he made a police report of the incident to Sergeant Kevin Smith of the Tennessee Highway Patrol. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Such payments were made in satisfaction of defendant’s own contractual obligations and did not constitute voluntary payments contemplated under Domestic Relations Law § 236(B) (7) (a)            In Aristova v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Such payments were made in satisfaction of defendant’s own contractual obligations and did not constitute voluntary payments contemplated under Domestic Relations Law § 236(B) (7) (a)            In Aristova v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
That was the issue before Arnold J. in his latest judgment considering the SPC Regulation in (1) Sandoz Limited (2) Hexal AG v (1) G.D. [read post]