Search for: "SULLIVAN V. SULLIVAN" Results 1321 - 1340 of 4,091
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 3:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Palin is, of course, a public figure, so under the landmark 1964 precedent of New York Times v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Marty Lederman
The constitutional analysis in the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Matal v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
On 19 May 2017, in the case of Dreyer v O’Sullivan, a psychiatrist was granted a without notice harassment injunction against an ex-patient who has been harassing him. [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:31 am
Sullivan, ––– F.Supp.3d ––––, ––––, 2017 WL 201332, at *6 (N.D. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 19 May 2017, in the case of Dreyer v O’Sullivan, a psychiatrist was been granted a without notice harassment injunction against an ex-patient who has been harassing him. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:45 pm
The case hung over the activists (and the New York Times) for years until the Supreme Court finally dismissed Sullivan’s claims in the landmark 1964 free speech case New York Times v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 7:41 am by Michael Froomkin
Spotted via Tom Sullivan at digby’s blog, who links to a transcript at The Pulse and makes a link to the US Supreme Court’s recent 5-3 decision Cooper v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Applying the Pell Doctrine in a disciplinary actionSullivan v County of Rockland, 2017 NY Slip Op 03519, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDisciplinary penalties imposed on public employees in New York State must meet the test set out in Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 12:58 pm by Howard Friedman
Sullivan,(9th Cir., April 12, 2017), the 9th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an inmate's RLUIPA complaint regarding restrictions on the wearing of dreadlocks.In Clark v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:44 am by Florian Mueller
Let me quote again from that Sullivan & Cromwell PR piece: "Blackberry argued that it was overpaying Qualcomm. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan (1964) (rejecting the view that libel is categorically unprotected, and holding that the libel exception requires a showing that the libelous accusations be “of and concerning” a particular person); Garrison v. [read post]