Search for: "Scales v. United States"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
The ECtHR stated that “questions of taxation, including allegations of large-scale tax evasion, concern a matter of public interest” [76] and reiterate the importance of reading statements contextually [85]. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:14 am
The agreements required class counsel to apply to a court for an incentive award for the named plaintiffs, and tied the named plaintiffs' compensation to a sliding scale based on the amount recovered.State, Dept. of Transp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm
Additionally, as I argued in my book, American Fair Trade, the corollary to Brandeis’s antimonopolism was the devolution of economic power to smaller business units. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:00 am
B.1(i) through (v). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:00 am
B.1(i) through (v). [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 12:26 am
It told the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that it had "conferred with Appellee International Trade Commission and Intervenor Apple Inc., and neither party object[ed] to the requested voluntary dismissal. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:58 am
One of the most notable ambiguities in Kavanaugh's record is the question of what he really thinks about the validity of the United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:48 am
American Lung Association v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:01 am
In September 2022, a woman was arrested for making a bomb threat against the Boston Children’s Hospital’s transgender care unit. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
The 27 elite attorneys included Phil Lacovara, former Watergate Prosecutor and the United States’ winning Supreme Court advocate in United States v Nixon.In a comprehensive, carefully researched “bill of particulars,” the 37-page ethics complaint lays out a 16-month pattern and practice of “conduct unbecoming a member of the bar” during Barr’s tenure under President Donald Trump. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The response of federal, state, and local authorities to the (actual and perceived) threat of an Ebola outbreak in the United States raises a number of legal questions. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
The lawmakers also seek “an independent national review of the scale, capabilities, ethics and rights impact of modern CCTV in the UK. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
In the United States, legal limits on prisoner isolation are largely the product of litigation, whereas the Canadian scheme arrived through legislation. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry')) The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 4:51 pm
United StatesSandvig v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decision in Janus v. [read post]
