Search for: "Smith v. California"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 2,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2016, 10:05 am
The class action lawsuit alleged that McDonald’s, alongside its franchisee, Smith Family LP, was in violation of California labor laws for its: Failure to pay overtime; Failure to maintain accurate records; Failure to reimburse workers for time they spent cleaning their uniforms. [read post]
3 May 2013, 7:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
A federal district court in California held that triable fact issues existed as to whether he was qualified for any of the four potential positions, whether his employer could have invoked the “special situations” provision of the union contract to override the seniority system, and whether it failed to engage in the interactive process by having only one meeting with him and interviewing him for only one job (Smith v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
E.g., Smith v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
Justice Smith in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Smith (1990), New York v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Smith (1990), New York v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:47 pm
There have been arguments over violent video games, overcrowded prisons, and the long-running battle over the estate of Anna Nicole Smith. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 1:52 pm
Carello v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:30 am
Smith signalled a possible 180. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:19 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:33 pm
” What prompted the Court’s review of Aguilar-Spinelli in the context of reasonable suspicion is the recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Navarette v California (__ US __, 134 SCt 1683 [2014]). [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:42 am
” Indeed, the language was explained most succinctly by Justice Hugo Black in Smith v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:30 am
Only the case wasn't "John Smith who bought Bayer and was shocked that he wasn't getting prostate cancer protection v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
City of Fort Smith, the court heard a similar case. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:00 pm
In fact, as pointed out by Judge Raker for the Court in Smith v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:42 pm
Indeed, the federal ban on marijuana is responsible for Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:58 am
If you live in a state like California or Oregon that licenses preparers, ask to see the license. [read post]
