Search for: "State v. Brain " Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,675
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 9:05 am
So stating, the CJEU smoothed the way to the sale of second-hand software, which is not the thing that some original software providers appreciate the most.Following that ruling, the IP community has been racking its brain(s) over that CJEU decision, in particular whether the principles stated there might be extended beyond the boundaries of the Software Directive and applied to other copyright-protected subject-matter, such as digital movies, music, or other audio-video… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
  The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:10 am by Jeff Foust
It would be strange if Russian money and brains were used for launching military payloads that would help in various unclear space projects. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:30 pm by Brian Shiffrin
byJill Paperno, author ofRepresenting the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseIn People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
, Taxes and Priorities, R.I.P., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:36 am by Eliana Baer
Nonetheless, that type of common sense analysis typically gets lost in the semantics of Lepis v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:34 am by David DePaolo
Mental injury claims have always presented some difficulty when they are disputed.Different states vary greatly on what qualifies as compensable when a claim of psychiatric or psychological injury is alleged.Some states have tight qualifying requirements, other states are more liberal.Many states tie any claim for mental injury to a prerequisite physical injury first.Florida has statutes of that nature - in general section 440.093 generally provides that mental… [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
RT: nonidentical state laws—you can’t enforce the FDCA but you can enforce state laws identical to those of the FDCA. [read post]