Search for: "State v. C. J. W." Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
Mostyn J also held that the implied undertaking bound not just the parties receiving the disclosure of their spouses, but also the media (following the lead of Roberts J in Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] EWHC 2314). [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
On the other hand, it is possible that the DST violates both the fundamental freedoms and the state aid rules. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm by Schachtman
Fisher noted that Lanier had been branded as deceptive by the second highest court in the United States, the United States Court of Appeals, in Christopher v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
The investor-state dispute settlement mechanism has been the subject of criticism in the United States, Canada and Mexico. [read post]