Search for: "State v. Daniels" Results 1321 - 1340 of 5,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants’ other [*2]arguments present disputed factual issues concerning the standard of care and proximate cause that are not properly resolved on a motion to dismiss the complaint (see Urias v Daniel P. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
” New Jersey is the last state without a law legalizing at least some cottage food sales [Amelia Nierenberg, New York Times] Reversing district court, Fifth Circuit panel upholds Indian Child Welfare Act against constitutional objections; dissent by Judge Owen finds a commandeering problem [Brackeen v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,520,669 entitled FLEXIBLE SUBSTRATE MOUNTED SOLID-STATE LIGHT SOURCES FOR EXTERIOR VEHICULAR LIGHTING and owned by Effectively Illuminated Pathways, LLC Filed September 6, 2011, by Volkswagen Group of America. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,520,669 entitled FLEXIBLE SUBSTRATE MOUNTED SOLID-STATE LIGHT SOURCES FOR EXTERIOR VEHICULAR LIGHTING and owned by Effectively Illuminated Pathways, LLC Filed September 6, 2011, by Volkswagen Group of America. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
JoynerBrasilia Declaration on the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons in the Americas, with introductory note by Daniel CostaEuropean Court of Human Rights: M.S.S. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:09 am by Amanda Rice
” At his Forbes Full Disclosure blog, Daniel Fisher suggests that “[t]he decision highlights the increasingly awkward conflict between supposedly conservative support of states’ rights and the liberals’ traditional support of consumer rights and federal power. [read post]